On 14th June, 2017, a fridge-freezer caught fire
in Grenfell Tower, a block of 127 flats in Kensington, in London. The appliance
was next to the window, and flames got out onto the cladding on the outside of
the building, and rapidly took hold of most of the building. Sadly, it seems
likely that 79 people died as a result. The course of the fire, in spreading to
the whole block, has not yet been fully investigated, but it is now clear that
the cladding and insulation which had been added to the outside of the block
were flammable, and it seems that the building and safety regulations may have
been inadequate. Much criticism has been levelled at the local government body
which owns the tower, and at successive national governments, which hold
responsibility for building and safety regulations.
Government and administration are weighty and complex
matters. However, from a Bahá’í perspective, certain principles are clear.
Firstly, Bahá’u’lláh made plain that government (at all levels) is an active,
and indeed pro-active, process. He said that “Governments should fully acquaint
themselves with the conditions of those they govern”, but it is reported that the
complaints of the tenants to the management company about several aspects of
the building seem to have been completely ignored over a number of years, and that
local government did not take it upon themselves to investigate.
Bahá’u’lláh also advises us to, “Be anxiously concerned with
the needs of the age ye live in, and centre your deliberations on its exigencies
and requirements.” The type of cladding used on Grenfell Tower would simply have
been illegal in many countries, which suggests that all governments should have
been actively investigating whether such a ban should have been applied in their
own territories. Other conditions which should have been subject to legislation
would include the number of staircases in a building. Grenfell Tower, like many
others, had just one staircase. Only one exit, for around 600 people, seems
unwise when not just fire but terrorist attack or other awful incidents can be
imagined.
Much has been made of the inordinate disparity between the
very wealthy and the remarkably poor social groups living side by side in this
part of London. Bahá’u’lláh’s Son, ‘Abdu’l-Bahá, predicted change: "The
time will come in the near future when humanity will become so much more
sensitive than at present that the man of great wealth will not enjoy his
luxury, in comparison with the deplorable poverty about him. He will be forced,
for his own happiness, to expend his wealth to procure better conditions for
the community in which he lives." Across the world, we have seen some
early glimpses of this starting to happen.
Bahá’u’lláh suggested laws limiting the extremes of wealth
and poverty, (see my April 2016 blog, “There is a better way”) and
stressed that we are all essentially one. After all, it seems clear that all
human beings have shared the same evolutionary past, over several million years:
“O Thou kind Lord! Thou hast created all humanity from the same stock. Thou
hast decreed that all shall belong to the same household…”. However, at the
time when Bahá’u’lláh was writing, in the 1860s, those in power often felt
themselves to be superior to the bulk of the population, leading Him to point
out to them: “Your people are your treasures... By them ye rule, by their means
ye subsist, by their aid ye conquer. Yet, how disdainfully ye look upon them!
How strange, how very strange!” Although great progress has been made in
leaving such attitudes behind, the modern world still has a long way to go
before all mankind feels as if it belongs to one household. Those in a position
of government, whether national or local, must “be anxiously concerned” about
improving conditions for everyone.
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
The final quotation was from one of a series of letters which Bahá’u’lláh wrote to the rulers of the time. In January, 2017, I wrote a blog post about His letter to Queen Victoria, and gave the post the title "Representatives of all that dwell on earth".
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
The final quotation was from one of a series of letters which Bahá’u’lláh wrote to the rulers of the time. In January, 2017, I wrote a blog post about His letter to Queen Victoria, and gave the post the title "Representatives of all that dwell on earth".
In February, 2016, a tower block fell sideways in Taiwan following an earthquake, and it was found that illegal materials had been deliberately used in the construction of the building. My post at that time was called "You might cheat people, but you cannot cheat nature".
More insidious was that recommendations made over the past decade and more to change the regulations had been systemmatically ignored, deferred or set aside my successive ministers and councils, and those who did speak up were bullied and belittled as alarmists.
ReplyDeleteSadly I believe a lot more than 79 people died there. Could have been around 600 people in the building and most unaccounted for.
ReplyDeleteIt is clear that present systems of democratic government require us to find representatives who can combine both moral compass and administrative capability; who can advance and protect the weakest members of society and the greater good of all against vested interest while delivering social policy and governance.
ReplyDeleteWhile its future form is indiscernible it is interesting to speculate how a Baha'i system of governance might operate on the basis of separating the election of Assemblies whose future role may be to apply an independent review of how well a proposal for social policy might align with the spiritual standards of the Faith.
Right now these two are coalesced within the functions of the Assemblies, but hints there are as to possible future developments as we delegate planning responsibilities to external committees who typically refer these to the Assembly for approval.
This is simply an observation around which a conversation on moral and administrative governance might revolve.
In September, 2016, I wrote a blog post called "Work in the spirit of service". This deals with some other aspects of work, government and respect for others.
ReplyDeleteWorse and worse it gets - the inquiry reveals that the company manufacturing the cladding was pressured by an umbrella company to which they were a subsidiary to ensure commercial competetivity. The manufacturer adjusted conditions of the fire tests by adding addition inflammable materials to assist performance which it did, before the test rig itself caught fire. The company evidently knew and concealed the variation so it appeared to meet requirements and those that were in a position to disclose this information were either too fearful of the consequences of doing so, or too addled on drugs to recognize their responsibility. That is why so many people died and why so many more remain at risk. I am sorry to write so fiercely of this, but it makes me so angry on so many levels - as a architect, as a former auxiliary fireman and a Baha'i.
ReplyDeleteCharles, we need people like you, who follow the twists and turns of the story, digest them, and relay them to the rest of us. Thank you.
ReplyDelete