In
almost every country on earth, some groups of people can be identified as
“minorities” – people who speak a different language from the “majority” in the
country, or follow a different religion, or whose lifestyle is noticeably
different from that of others. Probably because of our “us and them” way of
thinking, we react towards minorities in odd ways. Some people resent a
minority which still speaks its own language (“They live in our country. Why
can’t they be like us?”), but if the minority area asks to become a separate
country, which would remove the problem, that too is resented – they are
resented whether they are “in” or “out”. If there is a minority group which is perceived as richer, they are
resented for that; but if another group is woefully under-employed, they are
resented for that!
On British television screens, we have repeatedly been shown a particular
minority group – the Rohingyas, in Burma/Myanmar. This particular group of
people has apparently now been declared as non-citizens of the country,
although this people has been there for several generations. In a country which
includes many minorities (the ethnic Burmese [“Bamar”] are about 68% of the population,
the others belong to 134 different ethnic groups), the Rohingyas particularly
stand out. They look physically different from most groups in the country, and
they are Muslims, in a country where the dominant religion is Buddhism. When
Burma regained its independence in 1948, the constitution provided for a union,
in which the five largest ethnic groups would have autonomy for their areas.
The national flag, from 1948 until 1974, had five smaller stars around the main
star, to represent these autonomous areas. But no real progress was ever made
on recognition of the rights of the minorities – so it was not just a problem
for the Rohingyas, but it is they who are now in a particularly desperate
position.
Part of the Bahá’í approach to the world’s problems is to raise the status of
“minority” peoples – the positive features of every culture should be cherished
and encouraged. Although Bahá’í elections involve choosing people on their
personal qualities as individuals, care should nevertheless be taken that
material and cultural considerations do not prejudice the voter, and if
everything else is equal, then a representative of a minority group should be
favoured by the voter.
There are a large number of references in Bahá’í literature to down-trodden or
underprivileged groups. For example, Bahá’u’lláh once compared the black people
of the world to the black pupil of the eye, “from which the light of the Spirit
shines forth”, and His son ‘Abdu’l-Baha, talking of the native Americans, said,
“There can be no doubt that [through them] the whole earth will be illumined”.
On a world scale, everyone is part of a minority. In a population of 7 billion,
even the “Americans” and the “Chinese” are minorities. If we had a world
administration, based on the simple idea of “us” (the human beings) rather than
“us and them”, we would be supporting and protecting one another, as “minority”
peoples who are all on this planet together.
There is a richness and plenty to enjoy in diversity, unity is paramount!
ReplyDeleteUnity in Diversity would indeed be a perfect Human Condition!
ReplyDeleteIn my blog "The earth is one country" (August, 2015), I wrote more about the need to reform things in such a way as to care for *everybody*.
ReplyDelete